Confronting Ethical Research Practices

Should crypto researchers be #nocoiners? Or is it acceptable for researchers to disclose when they buy cryptocurrencies, sit on advisory boards, or launch startups? Is it ethically permissible for researchers to manipulate markets for experimental purposes? What are acceptable reasons for a researcher to buy cryptocurrencies?

There are myriad complications when conducting cryptocurrency and blockchain research. A curious issue arose for me, again, recently. I’ve long held small amounts of cryptocurrencies for experimentation and testing, but with the recent price jump of Bitcoin (and subsequent fall), the value of the cryptocurrency I had been experimenting with suddenly become less “experimental.” Recently, I ended up with over US $1000 of Bitcoin in an old wallet attached to mining experiments conducted in early 2013. In fact, I had entirely forgotten about the wallet after draining it years ago—not realizing that the crumbs I couldn’t bother sweeping away (originally about US $2) would eventually become a considerable sum!

Is it permissible in research to break live smart contracts, potentially containing significant sums of money?

Or, consider another, even more controversial example. Is it permissible in research to break live smart contracts, potentially containing significant sums of money? (Is this the same as breaking into a bank “for research” or something else entirely?) And, how about doing these experiments in a classroom setting?

Is it ethical to break smart contracts for research? 66% of the respondents of this Twitter poll think so.

The community clearly thinks breaking live contracts is ethically acceptable, but the confluence of computer security research practices, financial technologies, and a new research paradigm opens up myriad ethical issues that need serious thought.

This is uncharted territory for our emerging research area, and there is little existing guidance on acceptable practices (the ethical guidelines published by professional associations are not equipped to deal with these kinds of issues, and Institutional Research Boards lack the expertise needed to make judgements). To broach the topic of ethics in cryptocurrency and blockchain research (a topic that is long past due) I’m currently researching existing ethical guidelines and interviewing experts to gain a better understanding of the ethical issues present in cryptocurrency and blockchain research. From this research I will be developing preliminary guidelines tailored for our research area. I’ll report the findings in a future post.

Quinn DuPont


Interested in writing a blog post about your research? Contact us with a short pitch.

Alami, I. (2019). Money Power and Financial Capital in Emerging Markets. Money Power and Financial Capital in Emerging Markets, 2–5. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz3
Hütten, M. (2018). The soft spot of hard code: blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism. Global Networks, 3(2019), 329–348. https://doi.org/10/ggqh33
Musembwa, S., & Paul, S. (2020). Examining Interactions in Social Network Sites through the Lense of Social Capital. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3, 2918–2927. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz4
Levin, S. (2017). Facebook told advertisers it can identify teens feeling “insecure” and ’worthless’|. The Guardian, 18–20. www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/01/facebook-advertising-data-insecure-teens
Birkinbine, B. J. (n.d.). Incorporating the Digital Commons:Corporate Involvement in Free and Open Source Software.
Farndale, E., Brewster, C., & Poutsma, E. (2008). Coordinated vs. liberal market HRM: The impact of institutionalization on multinational firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11), 2004–2023. https://doi.org/10/drr2sg
Hub, T. I., Practice, I., Dynamics, F., & Crisis, G. (2018). Financial and economic review (Vol. 17).
Forum, W. E. (2020). Beyond the Taboo : Why Davos ’ Leaders Changed Their Minds on Digital Currencies. 2–5.
Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Goguen, M. (2018). A Digital Revolution Back to the Future: Blockchain Technology and Financial Governance. Banking & Financial Services Policy Report •, 37(9), 1–11.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10/dhdghm
Fligstein, N., & Zhang, J. (2020). A N e w Agenda for R e s e a r c h on t h e Trajectory of Chinese C a p i t a l i s m. 39–62.
Newsletter, E. (2003). www.econstor.eu.
Aug, N. (2003). Review : The Economic Sociology of Markets , Industries , and Firms Reviewed Work ( s ): The Architecture of Markets : An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First Century Capitalist Societies by Neil Fligstein The Twenty-First-Century Firm : Changing Economic O.
Work, R. (2013). カリフォルニア大学バークレー校(U.C. Berkeley)滞在記. Ensemble, 15(4), 250–260. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz5
Castillo, M. (2020). Bitcoin ’ s Guardian Angel : Inside Coinbase Billionaire Brian Armstrong ’ s Plan To Make Crypto Safe For All. 1–4.
Fligstein, N., & Stone Sweet, A. (2002). Constructing polities and markets: An institutionalist account of European integration. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1206–1243+I. https://doi.org/10/dtv39w
Lagarde, C., & International Monetary Fund. (2018). Winds of Change: The Case for New Digital Currency; by Christine Lagarde, IMF Managing Director; November 14, 2018. 1–7.
Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., Fund, M., & Fund, M. (2018). MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND INTERNATIONAL Cas. 1–2.
Tu, K. V., & Meredith, M. W. (2015). RETHINKING VIRTUAL CURRENCY REGULATION IN THE BITCOIN AGE IN TR O D U C TIO N ................................................................................ B IT C O IN ....................................................................................
Zhao, C. (2020). Binance CEO Makes Rare Price Prediction — Says This Is When To Buy Bitcoin. 2–5.
Mancini Griffoli, T., Martinez Peria, M., Agur, I., Ari, A., Kiff, J., Popescu, A., & Rochon, C. (2018). Casting Light on Central Bank Digital Currencies. Staff Discussion Notes, 18(08), 1. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz6
Mancini Griffoli, T., Martinez Peria, M., Agur, I., Ari, A., Kiff, J., Popescu, A., & Rochon, C. (2018). Casting Light on Central Bank Digital Currencies. Staff Discussion Notes, 18(08), 1. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz6
Schifrin, M., Dent, M., Hansen, S., Kauflin, J., & Sorvino, C. (2020). Edited by Michael del Castillo and Matt Schifrin Reported by: Lauren Debter, Millie Dent, Michael del Castillo, Sarah Hansen, Jeff Kauflin, Chloe Sorvino, Hank Tucker. 1–31.
Krippner, G. (2004). Polanyi Symposium: a conversation on embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 2(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10/cxjtc9
Beckert, J. (n.d.). The Great Transformation of Embeddedness Karl Polanyi and the New Economic Sociology MPIfG Discussion Paper.
Gemici, K. (2008). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10/fkh5cg
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63–72. https://doi.org/10/gf9j4s
Soziale, K., & Streeck, W. (2016). Anke H assel. 1–11.
Davies, H. (2020). must up their game. 1–5.
Pollock, D. (2020). Blockchain For Good : How The United Nations Is Looking To Leverage Technology. 1–5.
Bambrough, B. (2020). The Biggest Threat To Bitcoin Is Back On Track. 2–5.
Hess, M. (2004). ’ Spatial relationships ? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness. 2, 165–186.
Irvine, J. T., & Ethnologist, A. (2016). When Talk Isn ’ t Cheap : Language and Political Economy Published by : Wiley on behalf of the American Anthropological Association Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/645001 Accessed : 15-03-2016 21 : 17 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates y. 16(2), 248–267.
De, N. (2020). Story from News. 1–5.
Bambrough, B. (2020). The Biggest Threat To Bitcoin Is Back On Track. 2–5.
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10/dcr8x7
Neiger, M. (2020). Theorizing Media Memory : Six Elements Defining the Role of the Media in Shaping Collective Memory in the Digital Age. November 2019, 1–11. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz8
Hassel, A. (2014). Adjustments in the Eurozone: Varieties of Capitalism and the Crisis in Southern Europe. SSRN Electronic Journal, 76. https://doi.org/10/ghbk2c
Barefoot, K., Curtis, D., Jolliff, W., Nicholson, J. R., & Omohundro, R. (2018). Working Paper: Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy. https://www.bea.gov/system/files/papers/WP2018-4.pdf
Jes, M., & Iversen, M. J. (2020). The President and Fellows of Harvard College The " Varieties of Capitalism " Approach as an Analytical Tool for Business Historians The " Varieties of Capitalism " Approach as an Analytical Tool for Business Historians methodological with a conservative ,. 84(4), 664–666.
Coates, D. (2005). Varieties of capitalism, varieties of approaches. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522725
Brown, R. G. (2020). When ‘ Final ’ Isn ’ t Actually Final : Cracking Blockchain ’ s Consensus Conundrum. 1–11.
Townsend, K., Cafferkey, K., McDermott, A., Dundon, T., Morgan, G., & Doering, H. (2019). Varieties of Capitalism. Elgar Introduction to Theories of Human Resources and Employment Relations, 183–198. https://doi.org/10/ghbkz9
Edgington, B. (2020). Ethereum’s ‘Bazaar’ Development Model Will Pay O in 2020. 1–6.
Roberts, A., & Kwon, R. (2017). Finance, inequality and the varieties of capitalism in post-industrial democracies. Socio-Economic Review, 15(3), 511–538. https://doi.org/10/gbw6k5
Watt, L. (1994). Capitalising on crisis. Management, 41(10), 22.
Tobergte, D. R., & Curtis, S. (2013). Managed by the markets. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10/bwnm
Allen, M. (2004). The varieties of capitalism paradigm: not enough variety? Socio-Economic Review, 2(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10/fbh98q
Kang, N. (2006). A Critique of the “Varieties of Capitalism” Approach. ICCSR Research Paper Series, 45(45), 31. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/nubs/ICCSR/pdf/ResearchPdfs/45-2006.pdf
%d bloggers like this: